Friday, 7 February 2014

Study: UV and Ozone in Swimming Pool Treatment Expected to Grow


Chlorination is still the most widely used method of water disinfection for swimming pools, principally thanks to its cost, the ease of use and the huge range of products that are available.

However, many believe it would be desirable if chlorination of water could be phased out because of the known health and environmental risks. Chlorination byproducts have been linked in some studies to cancer risks, and chlorine might be corrosive to some types of swimming pools. 

High THM levels

Recently, researchers at Imperial College London said they found levels of trihalomethanes (THMs), a byproduct of chlorine, in London swimming pools that were higher than amounts found in tap water which had been associated with health problems.

Studies from the United States have suggested a correlation between the number of glasses of chlorinated tap water drunk daily by pregnant women and the risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirths and congenital malformations.

The presence of chloroform and other THMs in water has been blamed by some experts. The Imperial College team reported that the chloroform content of water in eight pools in London was on average 20 times higher than that of drinking water.

THMs are formed when chlorine, which is added to swimming pools to keep them clean, reacts with organic matter such as skin or hair. THMs can be absorbed through the skin, swallowed or inhaled.
To reduce THM formation, scientists recommended making sure people clean themselves before swimming and filtering the water.

Additional links

September 2001 also saw high levels of THMs linked to lung damage. Children who swim in a chlorinated pool once a week scored the same on one measure of lung damage as adult smokers, announced Belgian researchers.

The team took blood samples to measure levels of three surface proteins that indicate lung damage resulting from exposure to a high level of oxidants. They found the level of the proteins increased with higher exposure to chlorinated water.

This oxidative damage also increases the amount of 'surfactant' proteins, which the team measured after the children had been swimming. The highest levels detected were similar to those seen in adult smokers.

Other researchers have found an increased incidence of asthma in lifeguards who work in indoor pools, although further research will be carried out.

Wednesday, 5 February 2014

WHO Offers Ca/Mg Advice for POU/POE, Bottlers

GENEVA: Users of point-of-entry (POE) and point-of-use (POU) water treatment equipment should be made aware of the changes the devices can make in the mineral composition of drinking water and the potential impact of those changes on nutrient intake and health, the World Health Organization (WHO) said in a recently released report.

Further, WHO said in the report, "Those who sell or install these devices may be encouraged to bring to the attention of the users of these devices the possibility of reduced mineral intake and alternative means for [the minerals'] replacement."

The report is the result of a scientific symposium in Baltimore in April that looked at the health effects of calcium and magnesium in drinking water, and a subsequent WHO Meeting of Experts in Washington that examined research and comments presented at the symposium in an attempt to come up with recommendations.

Representatives of the water treatment industry were among symposium speakers and had urged WHO to consider the benefits of treatment methods such as ion-exchange softening and reverse osmosis, which typically reduce levels of calcium and magnesium ions in water.

WHO suggested in its report that manufacturers of POU/POE devices provide bypass or remineralization technology to ensure that adequate calcium and magnesium levels are maintained in water used for drinking.

WHO noted the important roles played by calcium and magnesium in the human diet, primarily in maintaining the health of bones (in the case of calcium) and in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease (magnesium); it added that "many people in most countries" fail to get enough of these minerals in their diets, although dietary need and consumption of the minerals can vary widely among individuals.

WHO also recommended that the public have access to information about the mineral content of bottled or packaged waters, saying there is "extreme variation" in mineral composition among bottled waters now on the market.

'Oxygen Waters' Make Airy Claims, Expert Says

Bottled waters infused with extra oxygen may provide no more exercise benefits than breathing ordinary air, a medical expert told the Beveragedaily.com news service earlier this year, as also reported this week by the The Water Connoisseur newsletter.

Dr. Claude Piantadosi, director of the Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology at Duke University Medical Center, wrote in the British Journal of Sports Medicine that there is more oxygen in a breath of fresh air than in a liter of the most "hyperoxygenated" bottled waters, according to the report.

Piantadosi said several studies suggest that the body can ingest only very small amounts of oxygen from drinking water compared with the amount required for exercise and that no significant amount of oxygen is absorbed through the intestine, according to Beveragedaily.com.

Bottled waters promoting their added oxygen, some at premium prices, have been big sellers in recent years; one such brand, Netherlands-based OGO, claims to have 35 times the oxygen of ordinary water.

The OGO Web site says this: "OGO oxygen products, in the form of water or oxygen canisters, enhance your everyday life. Use them to awaken your senses for the busy day ahead, whether you need to stay alert during meetings or whether you are in preparation for active sports. OGO helps you perform to the best of your abilities by enabling faster recovery from fatigue."

An OGO spokesman earlier this year told Beveragedaily.com that the company makes no medical claims "because we haven't done that kind of research," but he added that there was considerable anecdotal and documentary evidence that the water improved customers' well-being, although the effects could be partly psychological.

Supplementary oxygen in air is used in medical situations to aid breathing and may have benefits during exercise, according to the report.

NSF/ANSI Standard 61 Now Includes POE


Tankless Undercounter RO with UV

Coway USA is introducing its P-07FR, a new undercounter reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment system. This product represents the world’s most innovative tankless RO technology.

This product contains six filtration steps in four filters and includes a UV lamp. It features Coway's 700-gallons-per-day RO membrane filter technology that enables customers to drink water safely and comfortably without the risk of contamination from a water tank.

The filters are contained in a slim and hygienic case, protected from external contamination. P-07FR also has a filter change indicator, a Low & High Pressure Switch to prevent water shortage and overflow, and an Auto-Flushing System to manage filter condition and its lifetime.

Bay Point: Water Has High Levels of Dangerous Chemical

Bay Point residents voiced their concerns during a meeting Wednesday night about the safety of their drinking water, which contains high levels of a chemical known to increase the risk of cancer.

The water, which is treated by Golden State Water Company, contains high levels of Trihalomethane, a byproduct of chlorine disinfectant used to treat some drinking water. The chemical is known to increase the risk of cancer, particularly colon, bladder and rectal cancer, said Michael Kent, Contra Costa Hazardous Materials ombudsman.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has said that water that must contain fewer than 80 parts per billion of Trihalomethane in order to be safe to drink, Kent said.

Water in Bay Point currently has an average of 71.9 parts per billion, according to Contra Costa Health Services.

"The important thing to remember is that we are still well within that standard," Water Quality Engineer for Golden State Water Company Dawn White said. "The state health department and the federal EPA set those standards to be safe."

Other water districts in the area, however, have much lower Trihalomethane levels. Contra Costa Water District, for example, has 27.9 parts per billion. Antioch water has 45.5, Pittsburg has 11.2, Martinez has 8.9 and Oakley has 4.7 parts per billion, meaning Bay Point water has between 57 percent and 1,400 percent more Trihalomethane than surrounding communities, the county health department reported.

Trihalomethanes are formed when chlorine interacts with organic material in the water.
Many other water treatment facilities have switched to using chloramine, which is a combination of chlorine and ammonia. Chloramine creates fewer Trihalomethanes, but doesn't keep the water as clean, according to White.

The company is planning to install granular activated carbon filters that will significantly reduce the Trihalomethane levels in the water. But the project is expensive and the company wants to phase it in over time, White said.

Meanwhile, some areas served by the company are actually exceeding the safe levels of Trihalomethane, White confirmed. The 71.9 parts per billion figure came from an average of Trihalomethane levels taken from 12 locations throughout the service area, which provides water to an estimated 23,000 to 25,000 people in Bay Point.

White said that the company has been monitoring areas that tend to exceed the EPA standard and have been taking measures to reduce Trihalomethane levels, but they do occur.

Residents are also concerned about a proposed 15 percent rate increase over the next three years, especially since they feel they are getting worse quality water than neighboring communities and at a significantly higher cost, Kent said.

Bay Point residents pay an average of $60.77 per month for their water while Antioch residents pay an average of $27 to $30.77. Pittsburg residents pay an average of $41.15, Contra Costa Water District customers pay an average of $44.39 to $51.87, and Martinez residents pay an average of $48.20 to $55.68, according to Contra Costa Health Services.

The California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates how much utility companies can charge for their services, will hold a hearing on the proposed rate increase on May 17 in Bay Point.

Atrazine a Challenge for Small Systems

Atrazine has been a major agricultural herbicide for more than 40 years and may be found in some public or private drinking water supplies. It may cause health problems if found in amounts greater than the health standard established by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is 3 parts per billion (ppb).

The EPA established the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for atrazine in 1994. This is an enforceable level for public drinking water systems and, according to the EPA, is a concentration that is safe to drink over a 70-year lifetime with no adverse effects.

Recent findings indicate that elevated amounts of atrazine are running off fields and entering surface water resources. It may also be released to the environment in wastewater from manufacturing facilities.
Installing advanced treatment systems for removing atrazine could result in substantial costs to small water systems and their consumers.

Alternative strategies focus on controlling atrazine at its source and preventing or limiting its discharge into surface water. Atrazine runoff is lessened when: atrazine is applied to a dry soil surface; there is at least seven days between herbicide application and the first rainstorm-caused runoff; and the first rain after application is of low intensity.

Checking water sources
Public water supplies that use ground/surface water sources must follow this schedule for water sampling and monitoring:
  • Initial frequency. Four quarterly samples must be taken every three years.
  • Repeat frequency. If atrazine is not detected during the initial round, sampling can be reduced to two quarterly samples each year if serving more than 3,300 people - one sample every three years for smaller systems.
  • Triggers. Systems must return to initial testing frequency if atrazine is detected at more than 0.001 milligrams per liter.


The EPA has recently decided that atrazine is a greater public health threat than previously supposed, especially for children.

The agency upgraded its assessment of atrazine from a "possible" to a "likely" carcinogen. EPA officials also determined that as little as a single day of exposure may cause serious developmental and reproductive disabilities in fetuses, children and young males.

Health effects of atrazine include the following:
  • Short-term. The EPA has found atrazine to potentially cause congestion of heart, lungs and kidneys, low blood pressure, muscle spasms and weight loss and damage to adrenal glands when people are exposed to levels above the MCL for relatively short periods of time.
  • Long-term. Atrazine has the potential to cause the following effects from a lifetime exposure at levels above the MCL: weight loss, cardiovascular damage, retinal and some muscle degeneration, cancer.


Detection is frequent
The combination of widespread use and relative persistence in the environment help account for its frequent detection in surface and groundwaters. Microbial activity and other chemicals may break down atrazine in soil and water, particularly in alkaline conditions.

Photodegradation and volatilization do not reduce its presence. It may bind to some soils, but generally tends to leach to groundwater. Atrazine is not likely to be taken up in the tissues of plants or animals.

If the contaminant levels are above the MCL, water suppliers must take steps to reduce the amount of atrazine so that it is consistently below that level. If a utility detects atrazine in the water source, then it has to implement nonpoint source controls in the watershed or treat the raw water.

Granular activated carbon (GAC) has been approved by the EPA as the best available technology (BAT) for the control of herbicides, including atrazine. GAC has been shown to reduce atrazine levels to below analytical detection limits. GAC has an advantage in that it addresses other treatment requirements, such as taste and odor, and provides continuous control.

Most small systems do not have a granular activated charcoal system in place, and adding it would increase their operating costs. Activated charcoal filters are available for household treatment of drinking water at the point of use.

There are other alternatives: Powdered activated carbon (PAC) treatment has been considered appropriate for full-scale treatment. PAC is cheaper - it doesn't require the capital equipment of GAC - and can be added easily to the water during treatment. This makes PAC an attractive alternative for water suppliers experiencing seasonal herbicide occurrences.

Some other techniques that show promise, but require further study include ozone, advanced oxidation, reverse osmosis, photocatalytic reactions and synthetic resins.

If the levels of atrazine exceed the MCL, systems must notify the public via newspapers, radio, television and other means. Additional actions, such as providing alternative drinking water supplies, may be required to prevent serious risks to public health.

The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act required the EPA to re-evaluate its limit for atrazine in drinking water, and the revised standard was due in August 1999. However, that deadline has not been met.

The EPA now says it may alter the 3-ppb standard, based on annual average levels, to protect vulnerable populations from seasonal peaks. Utilities could be required to test for the chemical daily during peak contamination periods.

Banning atrazine would reduce water contamination, but could also increase other health and environmental risks. Adoption of best management practices for atrazine on an individual field is the preferred method for reducing risks while retaining benefits. The environmental risk of atrazine can be managed by altering the application rates, timing and placement of the herbicide.

Zacharia M. Lahlou, Ph.D., is the technical assistance coordinator for the National Drinking Water Clearinghouse, Morgantown, WV. He can be reached by e-mail at mlahlou2@wvu.edu.